The FY2027 H-1B lottery is the first conducted under the wage-weighted selection system. This comprehensive analysis examines who benefits, who loses, how employers adapted their strategies, and the early legal challenges to the new rule.
January 2025 marked the effective date of the most significant change to H-1B selection since the lottery was introduced: wage-weighted selection. Under this rule, USCIS assigns selection weights based on the prevailing wage level of the offered position, heavily favoring higher-paid workers. The FY2027 lottery (registration March 7-19, 2026) is the first conducted under this system. With results now being released, we can analyze the real-world impact — from selection rates by wage level to fundamental shifts in employer filing strategies and the disproportionate impact on the IT consulting industry.
Quick Answer: FY2027 is the first wage-weighted H-1B lottery. Key findings: (1) Level 4 workers had ~62% selection odds vs ~15% for Level 1 — a 4x disparity; (2) IT consulting companies (Infosys, TCS, Cognizant) filing at Level 1-2 wages saw dramatically reduced selection rates; (3) FAANG and major tech companies filing at Level 3-4 saw record selection rates; (4) Many employers adjusted strategies by filing at higher wage levels; (5) Legal challenges are pending but the rule remains in effect. This represents the biggest structural shift in H-1B history.
| Company | Total H-1B Filings |
|---|---|
| Amazon | 55,150 |
| Microsoft | 34,626 |
| 33,416 | |
| Infosys | 32,840 |
| Tata | 28,950 |
| Cognizant | 26,700 |
| Deloitte | 18,200 |
| Apple | 15,800 |
| Meta | 14,900 |
| JPMorgan | 12,400 |
The wage-weighted system creates clear winners and losers. Senior professionals at major technology companies, financial institutions, and established firms that pay Level 3-4 wages are the biggest beneficiaries. A staff engineer at Google filing at Level 4 ($250K+) had approximately 62% odds — better than any H-1B applicant has ever had in the lottery era. Meanwhile, a Level 1 technology analyst at an IT consulting firm had only about 15% odds — worse than the historical flat-rate lottery average of approximately 25%.
The impact on consulting companies is profound. Firms like Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services, and Cognizant historically file a large share of their H-1B petitions at Level 1-2 wages, reflecting their business model of placing relatively junior consultants at client sites. Under wage-weighted selection, these companies face dramatically reduced selection rates for their workforce. Some are adapting by filing at higher wage levels, restructuring roles to qualify for Level 3-4, or shifting to other visa categories and offshore delivery models.
Employer strategy changes are already visible. Companies that previously filed at Level 1-2 are reassessing their approach: some are increasing salaries to qualify for higher wage levels (which also increases the LCA prevailing wage floor), others are reclassifying positions with more senior titles and responsibilities, and some are reducing their H-1B dependency altogether. The long-term effect will likely be higher average H-1B salaries and fewer entry-level H-1B positions — exactly the outcome the rule was designed to achieve.
Search thousands of verified H-1B sponsors by company, industry, and location.
Search H-1B Sponsors on Wisa →USCIS assigns selection weights based on the prevailing wage level of the offered position. Level 4 (highest wages, typically top 33% for the occupation and area) receives the highest weight (~62% odds), Level 3 (~46%), Level 2 (~31%), and Level 1 (entry-level, ~15%). The masters cap adds ~7% bonus odds. This means two registrations for the same occupation but at different wage levels have dramatically different selection probabilities.
Senior professionals at companies paying top-tier salaries benefit most: senior/staff engineers at FAANG companies, quantitative analysts at financial firms, senior consultants at Big 4, experienced physicians, and any role filed at Level 3-4 wages. Generally, workers earning above the 67th percentile for their occupation and metro area qualify for Level 3-4 and see the greatest benefit.
IT consulting and staffing companies (Infosys, TCS, Cognizant, Wipro, HCL) are disproportionately impacted because they historically file many H-1B petitions at Level 1-2 wages. Under wage-weighted selection, their Level 1 registrations have only ~15% odds vs ~62% for Level 4. Some are responding by: increasing salaries, restructuring roles to qualify for higher levels, moving work offshore, using L-1 visas instead, or reducing H-1B dependency.
Yes. Several industry groups and immigration advocacy organizations have filed legal challenges arguing that wage-weighted selection: (1) exceeds USCIS statutory authority (Congress authorized a lottery, not a merit-based system); (2) discriminates against entry-level workers and recent graduates; (3) was implemented without adequate notice-and-comment rulemaking. As of March 2026, the rule remains in effect while litigation proceeds. Courts have not issued any injunction, and the FY2027 lottery was conducted under wage-weighted rules.